Legal Opinion

Andersen v. A.M.W., Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 2003No. S-02-756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

NATURE OF CASE

David H. Andersen brought this breach of contract action against A.M.W., Inc. (AMW), alleging that AMW had failed to pay commissions due Andersen. A bifurcated trial was held on the issue of whether the action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. The trial court found that a cause of action accrued when Andersen did not receive his first commission payment (sometime after July 31, 1992) and that he had a right to institute suit when this breach occurred. The court concluded that the commencement of suit on January 12,2001, was beyond the 5-year statute of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Singer Co., Link Simulation Systems Division v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Manker v. MankerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Egan v. StolerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cavanaugh v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass'n v. HamNebraska Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Controlled Environments Construction, Inc. v. Key Industrial Refrigeration Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Neuromonitoring Associates v. Centura Health Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Steele v. SedlacekNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Susman v. Kearney Towing & Repair Ctr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Susman v. Kearney Towing & Repair Ctr.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API