Gibbs v. Loomis, Fargo & Co.

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

Andres Gibbs sued Loomis, Fargo & Company ffkJa Wells Fargo Armored Service Corporation (“Loomis Fargo”) and two former Loomis Fargo employees for malicious prosecution. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and Gibbs appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed favorably to the nonmoving party, shows that no genuine issue of material fact remains and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Viewed in this light, the record shows that Loomis Fargo is an…