Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Home Depot, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 30, 2005No. A05A1156PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

Charles McNeely sued The Home Depot, Inc., Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., and a Home Depot employee for malicious prosecution. The defendants moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. McNeely appeals. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is proper when the evidence, construed in a light most favorable to the nonmovant, demonstrates that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Viewed in this manner, the record shows that McNeely was employed by Brinks, and he was responsible for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Standard v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Walker v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. Smith v. Trust Co. BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. Vojnovic v. BrantsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Swift v. WitchardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Marshall v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Renton v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Adams v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. McKissick v. S. O. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. McKissick v. AYDELOTTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API