Legal Opinion

Mumford v. Keet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. James T„ Neville, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

The petition in this case states that defendant purchased a city lot in Springfield, Missouri, .from one Horine on the thirty-first of August, 1892, which was incumbered by the lien of a judgment, against his grantor, rendered on the twelfth day of March, 1892; that on the eighteenth of January, 1893, defendant executed a deed of trust on said city lot to-*503secure $1,000, borrowed by him from the National Investment Company of Springfield, Missouri, and covenanted in said trust deed that he was seized of an indefeasible estate in fee simple against incumbrances, for further assurance and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. ScalzoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Bank of Little Rock v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Wetmore v. CrouchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wade v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Cousins v. BowlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Kansas City v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Marshall v. FergusonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Mumford v. KeetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API