Legal Opinion

Wetmore v. Crouch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cowrt. — Hon. Leroy. B. Valliant, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRombauer, P. J.

This is a petition in equity for .an accounting. Upon the hearing of the plaintiff’s *442evidence the trial court declared that, under the pleadings and evidence, the plaintiff was not entitled to the relief prayed for, nor to any relief. The plaintiff thereupon took a voluntary nonsuit, and, upon the refusal of the court to set it aside, brings the case here by appeal. The defendant now contends that there was no error in the ruling of the court, because the plaintiff’s petition states no cause of action for an accounting, and her evidence substantiates none. The plaintiff takes issue on both…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Donnell v. HarsheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Musser v. BrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. Lengle v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Newberger v. FriedeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wetmore v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  2. Wetmore v. CrouchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Mumford v. KeetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API