Legal Opinion

Mumford v. Keet

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Greene Circuit Court. — Hon. James T. Neville, Judge. Judge Bland concurring, Judge‘Biggs dissenting. Certified to supreme court.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

*536Tpííád¡ngctice: *535This is the second appeal in this case. When it was here before it was remanded to enable plaintiffs to file an amended petition. This has been done by adding to the statements of the former petition *536(65 Mo. App. 502) an averment that in order to escape eviction, plaintiffs were compelled to pay $600 in purchasing an outstanding paramount title to the land acquired by plaintiffs' under defendant’s covenant for warranty and seizin. Judgment is prayed for this sum and interest. Defendant filed an extended answer, which in addition to a denial of plaintiffs’ right to sue and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Knapp, Stout & Co. v. FinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Brown v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  3. Mumford v. KeetMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hagemann v. PinskaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kahn v. Mercantile Town Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API