Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.D.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1987No. 15488PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

McKEEVER, Circuit Judge.

This is a dependency and neglect action in which the parental rights of D.A.D. (father) were terminated as to A.D. (his minor daughter). Father has appealed contending the trial court erred by:

1. Allowing the mother (D.R.D., mother of A.D. and girl friend of father) to participate through her counsel, by presenting evidence and cross-examining witnesses at the dispositional hearing after the mother voluntarily had her parental rights terminated, and by,

2. Terminating his parental rights since termination was not the least restrictive alternative in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. In Re Estate of HobelsbergerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Dwyer v. ChristensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Century 21 Associated Realty v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People ex rel. L.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Satter v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. O'CONNOR v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wolff v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API