Legal Opinion

S.G. Loewendick & Sons, Inc. v. Reich

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 21, 1995No. 94-1662PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

The Secretary of Labor cited S.G. Loewen-diek & Sons, Inc., for violating a safety regulation prohibiting workers from riding on a load suspended by a crane. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission sustained the citation and assessed a fine. Loewendick challenges the fine, contending that the backhoe it suspended from a crane was a “personnel platform” exempt from the general prohibition of riding crane-suspended loads. On its surface, this case involves an arcane dispute about whether a specially modified backhoe suspended by a crane is a personnel platform…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Thomas Jefferson University v. ShalalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gardebring v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Co. v. United Transportation UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  2. Util. L. Rep. P 14,084 Bluestone Energy Design, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HenneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  4. Fabi Construction Co. v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  5. Otis Elevator Company v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API