Legal Opinion

Haynes v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1912No. 10221PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J., entered November 18, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for personal injuries.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, a minor of the age of nine years, brought this action by his guardian against the city of Seattle to recover for personal injuries. At the time he received his injury, the respondent was attending one of the primary public schools of the city of Seattle. The land upon which the school building was constructed abutted upon a street known as Eleventh avenue north, the land' opening directly upon the street, no fence or barriers of any kind being erected to separate the one from the other. On the day of the accident, a force of men working for the city were engaged in stretching…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Akin v. Bradley Engineering & Machinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Olson v. Gill Home Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Nelson v. McLellanWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ilwaco Railway & Navigation Co. v. HedrickWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McAllister v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schock v. Ringling Bros. Etc.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bjork v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Riggle v. LensOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gregg v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Indianapolis v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API