Legal Opinion
Angelier v. State Board of Pharmacy
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 16, 1997No. B101247PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
In this suit for administrative mandamus relief (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5 (section 1094.5)), petitioner Daniel M. Angelier (Angelier) seeks to overturn a decision by the California State Board of Pharmacy (the Board) 1 which revoked Angelier’s license to practice pharmacy. The trial court denied Angelier’s request for relief. On appeal, Angelier challenges the sufficiency of the trial court’s statement of decision, and he questions whether the court applied the correct standard of review of the administrative evidence. Angelier also challenges the court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. Casa Blanca Convalescent Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Walling v. KimballCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mansell v. Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Holmes v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Handyman Connection of Sacramento, Inc. v. SandsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- The Termo Company v. LutherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.