Rasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
HOUSTON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Now before this Court is Defendants’ Midland Credit Management, Inc. (“Midland”) and J. Brandon Black (“Black”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion for judgment on the pleadings of pro se Plaintiff Rasidescu’s complaint. Doc. No. 37.
PROCECURAL BACKGROUND
On September 16, 2005, pro se Plaintiff Radu Rasidescu (“Rasidescu”) filed a complaint, against Defendants. On October 5, 2005, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(1). Doc. No. 4. Plaintiff filed an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forcellati v. Hyland's, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Thomas v. Dun & Bradstreet Credibility Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- July v. Terminix Int'l Co.United States Circuit Court · 2019
- Pinnacle Fitness & Recreation Management, LLC v. Jerry & Vickie Moyes Family TrustDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Cammarata v. Kelly Capital, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018