Pinnacle Fitness & Recreation Management, LLC v. Jerry & Vickie Moyes Family Trust
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND GRANTING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Currently before the Court are three motions: (1) the motion for summary judgment filed by the Jerry and Vickie Moyes *1081Family Trust (hereinafter the “Trust”); (2) the motion for partial summary judgment filed by Pinnacle Fitness and Recreation Management, LLC (hereinafter the “Pinnacle”); and (3) the motion for judgment on the pleadings filed by Pinnacle. The hearing for these motions set for…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Steinhausen v. HomeServices of Neb.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015