Legal Opinion
County of Humboldt v. McKee
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 15, 2008No. A117325PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMONS, Acting P. J.
In 1965, the Legislature confronted two troubling trends in California: the loss of agricultural land to development and the haphazard growth of suburbia, requiring the “extension of municipal services to remote residential enclaves, and interfering] with agricultural activities.” (Sierra Club v. City of Hayward (1981) 28 Cal.3d 840, 850 [171 Cal.Rptr. 619, 623 P.2d 180] (Sierra Club), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in Friends of East Willits Valley v. County of Mendocino (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 191, 204-205 [123 Cal.Rptr.2d 708].) “The Legislature…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Sierra Club v. City of HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Simmons v. WareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Woodland Park Management, LLC v. City of East Palo Alto Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Citri-Lite Co. v. Cott Beverages, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Nick v. City of Lake ForestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. Cnty. of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.