Legal Opinion

Nunneker v. Murdock

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1983No. C-820333PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

This appeal focuses on the sufficiency under R.C. 303.12 of a referendum petition that was signed and submitted by electors of Springfield Township, but rejected by the Hamilton County Commissioners. Specifically, the petition called for a vote on a resolution adopted by the county commissioners that would amend the zoning of certain property in Springfield Township from “C-Residence” to “DD-Planned Multiple Residence.” After Resolution No. 641, allowing the zone change, was duly adopted by the board of county commissioners, plaintiffs-appellants (hereinafter, “the circulators”) presented a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Sharpe v. HittOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State ex rel. English v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Christy v. Summit Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Gemienhardt v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State ex rel. Hamilton v. Clinton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API