State ex rel. Schultz v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The referendum petition submitted by relators does not indicate anywhere that one of the paragraphs included in the title of the resolution, to be voted on was- hot adopted by the Olmsted Township Board of Trustees. It is apparent, therefore, that the: referendum petition does not fairly and accurately present the issues sought to be submitted to the electorate. Markus v. Bd. of Elections (1970), 22 Ohio St. 2d 197....Accordingly, the judgment of the .Court of Appeals, denying the writ of mandamus, is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
O’NEnÍL, C. J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, .CELEBREZZE, Stephenson…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Markus v. Trumbull County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Christy v. Summit County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Christy v. Summit Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Hamilton v. Clinton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Nunneker v. MurdockOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel. Baur v. Medina County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.