Law Offices of Andrew L. Ellis v. Yang
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
I
INTRODUCTION
In this appeal from the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16), 1 we hold that the trial court lacked the jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion because prior to the ruling plaintiff had voluntarily dismissed the case before trial had commenced, i.e., plaintiff had filed a request for dismissal prior to the trial court making a dispositive ruling or giving an indication of the merits of the underlying case, and prior to a time when the procedural posture was such that plaintiff would inevitably lose.
II
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Wells v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Kyle v. CarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Vargas v. City of SalinasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mindys Cosmetics, Inc. v. DakarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- City of Colton v. SingletaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Tourgeman v. Nelson & KennardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Pittman v. Beck Park Apartments Ltd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.