Miller v. BANK OF AMERICA, NT & SA
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MORENO, J.
Relying upon our decision in Kruger v. Wells Fargo Bank (1974) 11 Cal.3d 352, 356 [113 Cal.Rptr. 449, 521 P.2d 441] (Kruger), account holders who deposited Social Security or other public benefit funds into checking or savings accounts and then overdrew those accounts contend that Bank of America, NT & SA, may not recoup the overdrawn amounts and charge insufficient funds fees for each transaction that results in an overdraft. In Kruger, we held that a bank may not satisfy a credit card debt by deducting the amount owed from a separate checking account containing deposits…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nationsbank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Huff v. Securitas Sec. Servs. United States, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Miller v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Flores v. Southcoast Auto. Liquidators, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Cachet Fin. Servs. v. C&J Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Gates v. MCT Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.