Legal Opinion

The Wrentham Co. v. Cann

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 5, 1963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

The plaintiff (Wrentham) seeks to enforce the restrictive covenant in a contract of employment executed on July 15,1958, against a former employee, the defendant Cann. Cann contests the enforceability of the covenant and, by way of counterclaim, asks that Wrentham be ordered to pay him $250.94 for unpaid salary, commissions and disbursements, and that an accounting be had to determine the value of certain shares of stock now held by him in Wrentham.

The case was referred to a master on the limited issue of the enforceability of the covenant not to compete. The report contained subsidiary and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Sherman v. PfefferkornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  3. Novelty Bias Binding Co. v. ShevrinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  4. Rioux v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  2. Medtronic, Inc. v. Charles F. Benda, Emil Conde and William C. CainCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Nassau Sports v. PetersDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  4. Lupien v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Sarnow v. SarnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API