Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
For a decade the plaintiff, Robert H. Kroeger (Kroeger), scaled the corporate ladder at The Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. (Stop & Shop). His annual bonuses, added to his salary, were such as to stimulate Kroeger in 1961 to ask for a deferred compensation arrangement. In response Stop & Shop proffered a written agreement which, in the argot of the trade, applied “golden handcuffs.” That is, should Kroeger “so long as he lives,” go to work for a competing business east of the Mississippi, he would lose all.1 It *312is the reasonableness of the forfeiture provision that is the problem for decision.
In…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Boulanger v. Dunkin' Donuts Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Ward v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.