Legal Opinion

Kroeger v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 16, 1982PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

For a decade the plaintiff, Robert H. Kroeger (Kroeger), scaled the corporate ladder at The Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. (Stop & Shop). His annual bonuses, added to his salary, were such as to stimulate Kroeger in 1961 to ask for a deferred compensation arrangement. In response Stop & Shop proffered a written agreement which, in the argot of the trade, applied “golden handcuffs.” That is, should Kroeger “so long as he lives,” go to work for a competing business east of the Mississippi, he would lose all.1 It *312is the reasonableness of the forfeiture provision that is the problem for decision.

In…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Fortune v. National Cash Register Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Gram v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. New England Canteen Service, Inc. v. AshleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  4. Marine Contractors Co. Inc. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. All Stainless, Inc. v. ColbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Alexander & Alexander. Inc. v. DanahyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Boulanger v. Dunkin' Donuts Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Ward v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API