Legal Opinion
Spangenberg v. Spangenberg
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1932No. Docket No. 7243PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order granting change of place of trial from the city and county of San Francisco, where the action was begun, to the county of Los Angeles, the place of residence of the defendant.
Some technical objections to the moving papers are made by plaintiff, but the irregularities mentioned are of little moment.
The notice of motion, instead of naming a definite date for the hearing, stated that the defendant would move the court for the desired order “at a date and time to be fixed by the Clerk”. This notice bears date of June 4, 1929; and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mason v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Thompson v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- More v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Nason v. FeldhusenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Golden Cross Mining & Milling Co. v. SpiersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Haurat v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Walker v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Huron Valley National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Huron Valley National BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.