Legal Opinion · Dissent

Continental Casualty Co. v. Huron Valley National Bank

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1978No. Docket 77-1893Published

1DissentM. J. Kelly, J.

I agree with the majority that the three-year limitation upon actions to recover damages for "injury to property” does not necessarily mean a physical injury to tangible property, and a conversion of a check may be considered an "injury to property” under the statute. See Side v Thompson, 205 NYS2d 240, 241 (1960), Bernstein v N V Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaartmaatschappij, 76 F Supp 335, 344 (DC NY, 1948), Mintzer v Windsor Lamp Mfg Co, 175 Misc 551, 552; 23 NYS2d 990, 991 (1940). See also Money Corp v Draggoo, 274 Mich 527; 265 NW 452 (1936). But see Spangenberg v Spangenberg, 123…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  2. Henderson v. Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. A. Blum Jr.'s Sons v. WhippleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Abbott v. Michigan State IndustriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Bernstein v. N. v. Nederlandsche-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart-MaatschappijDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API