Legal Opinion

Hildebrandt v. Allied Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1987No. 86-5464PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Chief Judge.

This appeal involves a personal injury action brought by John Jeanetta and Raymond Oney against several chemical companies who manufactured toluene diisocya-nate (TDI). Both plaintiffs alleged they incurred permanent lung damage by reason of their exposure to TDI while working for Whirlpool Corporation in Minnesota. The trial court, the Honorable James Rosen-baum, entered summary judgment for the defendants on the grounds that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the Minnesota stat ute of limitations. 1 We reverse and remand for a plenary trial. 2

Jeanetta and Oney were both…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Maughan v. SW Servicing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  3. John A. Karjala v. Johns-Manville Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. May v. AC & S, INC.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
  4. Huggins v. Stryker Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  5. Karen Ann Klempka v. G.D. Searle and Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API