Legal Opinion
Progressive Welfare Assn., Inc. v. Morduchay
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 12, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought an action upon a joint and several note of the defendants, not incorporating a copy of it in the complaint nor annexing it as an exhibit. On the defendant’s motion for oyer the plaintiff filed a copy. This made it a part of the pleadings and laid the basis for a demurrer by the defendants that the terms of the note violated the usury statute. Morehouse v. Employers’ Liability Assur. Corp., 119 Conn. 416, 421, 177 Atl. 508. A demurrer upon that ground was sustained.
The plaintiff filed a substitute complaint, the allegations of which, so far as necessary to present the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- In re Waddell-Entz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Morehouse v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Dies v. Wilson County BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Winsted Bank v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- International Union of Electrical Workers v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- In re FeldmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1966
- First National Bank & Trust Co. v. LevyConnecticut Superior Court · 1951
- Progressive Welfare Assoc., Inc. v. MorduchayConnecticut Superior Court · 1939