Legal Opinion
Dies v. Wilson County Bank
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1913PublishedCited by 24 opinions
FROM WILSON. Appeal from tlie Circuit Court of Wilson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court. —Jno. E. Richabdson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
This case was brought upon a note dated September 30, 1910, in terms as follows:
“Pour months after date we promise to pay to the order of ■ the Lebanon National Bank, one hundred ninety-eight & 35/100 dollars. Renewal of note due Wilson County Bank.
“The drawers and indorsers severally waive presentment for payment, protest and notice of protest, and nonpayment of this note, and in case of suit agree to pay. court costs and all reasonable attorney fees for collecting same, and the principal may be granted further time, after due, from period to period, on payment of interest, without releasing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dibert v. D'ArcySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- London & San Francisco Bank, Ltd. v. ParrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re Waddell-Entz Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Easton v. German-American BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cotton v. Atlas National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- TWB Architects, Inc. v. The Braxton, LLCTennessee Supreme Court · 2019
- Bank of Crockett v. CullipherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
- Darby v. Farmers' State Bank of BurkburnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Rhea v. Marko Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- First National Bank of Sparta v. YowellTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.