Legal Opinion
Howard Converters, Inc. v. French Art Mills, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 9, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Crane, Ch. J.
The plaintiff is a New York corporation. The defendant is a foreign corporation, a New Jersey corporation. The defendant is not licensed by New York to do business here.
On February 26, 1936, the plaintiff, claiming that the defendant had breached its contract theretofore made, obtained a warrant of attachment and levied on the defendant's property here. On March 18, 1936, twenty-one days after warrant of attachment was granted, one Filbert L. Rosenstein, the designated agent of the defendant, was personally served without the State with the summons and complaint, without an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Fire Insurance v. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matthews v. MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Geary v. GearyNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frene v. Louisville Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Meyer v. Indian Hill Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Breer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Supreme Court · 2000
- A. M. Simon Co. v. William McWilliams Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Handel v. BrodskyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.