Legal Opinion
Breer v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 11, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Paul A. Victor, J.
In these consolidated proceedings, defendant Worthington Cylinders Corporation (hereinafter Worthington) moves by order to show cause for an order dismissing the complaint of plaintiffs Russell Breer and Shirley Breer, as well as the cross claims of defendants Sears, Roebuck and Co., Imperia Bros., Inc., LPG Fuels, Inc., and the cross claims of Andrew Rogers, Administrator of the Estate of Catherine Day, on the ground that personal jurisdiction over the moving defendant was not acquired.
Issues Presented
In a case of first impression under the CPLR, this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Flick v. Stewart-Warner Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Phoenix Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Low v. WerkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Montella v. BrattonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Flannery v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blau v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Bialota v. Lakota Lakes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Bialota v. Lakota Lakes, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams. v. Tradewinds Airlines, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2009
- TAZ Productions, Inc. v. Rentacom, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2008