Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Indian Hill Farm, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 22, 1958No. Nos. 343-345, Dockets 24999-25001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Indian Hill Farm, Inc., seeks reversal of an order of the district court appointing a receiver for certain real estate in which it has an interest. The only issues raised are (1) whether the district court lacked personal jurisdiction over appellant, and (2) whether, if the district court had jurisdiction, appointment of a receiver was an abuse of discretion under the facts of the case. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we hold that the district court acquired sufficient jurisdiction over appellant to appoint a receiver and that it did not abuse its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lambert Run Coal Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cain v. Commercial Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Pang-Tsu Mow v. Republic of China (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- The State of Washington, Etc. v. The American League of Professional Baseball ClubsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Citibank, N.A. v. Nyland (CF8) Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Thomas E. Reynolds v. Behrman Capital IV L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- McCurtain County Production Corp. v. CowettDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Connecticut v. Levi Strauss & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.