Curtis v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of the case. The facts appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWeldon, J.
The petition alleges that one Isaac S. Eandall entered into a transportation contract with the defendants, known as No. 61220, which began on the 1st day of July, 1881, and expired on the 1st day of July, 1882; that the decedent and C. P. Head were surety on the contract in the penal sum of $20,000; that on the 16th day of September Eandall defaulted in the execution of the contract; that the decedent and his co-surety were notified of such default, and called upon by the proper authorities to fulfill the same or pay the penalty, and that thereupon the decedent and his cosurety notified said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bruce v. WestcottNew York Supreme Court · 1848
3Cited by11 opinions
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Frank E. Lipp v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Lipp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Pink v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.