Pink v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhauex, Judge
This case arises on contracts entered into with the Government which have been fully performed and the work accepted. The defendant has demurred to the allegations in the petition on the ground that on the face of the petition it shows that the suit has been brought more than six years after the cause of action accrued.
■ On March 22, 1933, the Supreme Court of the State of New York directed the Superintendent of Insurance to take *122possession of the property, and liquidate the affairs of the Southern Surety Company and on May 10, 1935, Louis H. Pink was appointed to succeed George S. Van…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Withers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
- Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1898
- C. L. Maguire Petroleum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Lins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Copco Steel & Engineering Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.