Legal Opinion

State v. Sewell

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 2, 1974No. 1188-2PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C. J.

— Andrew C. and Dorothy M. Sewell appeal from their convictions on four counts each of possession of controlled substances. They assign error to the trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress evidence, and to the denial of a motion seeking disclosure of an informant’s identity.

The relevant facts are as follows. On April 25, 1973, Officer John Stonehouse of the Bremerton Police Department submitted an affidavit to a judge of the Kitsap County Superior Court, seeking a warrant to search the Sewell residence. In this affidavit, he put forth information calculated to show that an informant had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rugendorf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. State v. GoodlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  4. State v. HinkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. ChenowethWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. CasalWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. State v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. State v. AtchleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API