Legal Opinion
Dolan v. Fairbanks Capital Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 13, 2013No. 03 CV 3285 (DRH) (AKT)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, Senior District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Michael T. Dolan (“plaintiff’ or “Dolan”) commenced this action alleging that defendants Fairbanks Capital Corp. (“FCC”)1 and PMI Mortgage Insurance Company (“PMI”) violated various federal and state laws in connection with the servicing of his mortgage and related foreclosure proceedings. Presently before the Court are separate motions made by FCC and PMI pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 56 seeking dismissal of the Second and Third Amended Complaints. For the reasons set forth below, FCC’s motion is…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mosdos Chofetz Chaim, Inc. v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Zirogiannis v. Seterus, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Hoover v. HSBC Mortgage Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2014
- Allstate Insurance Company v. CPM Med Supply IncDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.