Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Pennington

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 1931No. Docket No. 7600PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

Defendants and appellants Pennington owned and operated an apartment house in San Francisco. Plaintiff and respondent Aileen Fisher paid one month’s rent in advance for a furnished apartment. On the morning of the thirteenth day of March, 1929, plaintiff was occupying a bed in the furnished apartment when the door to which the bed was attached fell inward over the top of the bed, causing injuries to plaintiff. A jury returned a verdict against the defendants.

The door was used as a partition between a room and a closet and was attached to the floor and the overhead wall. Its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gosliner v. BrionesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Miller v. WaddinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Pennybecker v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Watwood v. FosdickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Stowe v. Fritzie Hotels, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Newman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Arvin-Kern Co. v. B. J. Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API