Legal Opinion

Airmotive Engineering Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 12, 1976No. Nos. 43-74 & 151-74PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKtjnzig, Judge

In these combined contract renegotiation cases of first impression, plaintiff comes before the court seeking a determination that certain value engineering (YE) incentive awards received from defendant are not subject to renegotiation within the provisions of the Renegotiation Act (the Act). Because the YE awards were received by 'plaintiff under a contract subject to renegotiation, we deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.

On January 12,1968, plaintiff and the Department of the Air Force entered into a one-year service contract for the repair of jet engine blades. The contract…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of NoelSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Putnam Mills Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  4. Selman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  5. California-Pacific Utilities Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. John Val BrowningCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Gutierrez-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Edwards v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Grismac Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API