Legal Opinion

City of Klawock v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 9, 1983No. 134-80CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARKINS, Judge.

Plaintiff, City of Klawoek (City), seeks $72,000 damages for breach of an alleged *582contract with the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) to settle plaintiff’s claims for water furnished to a fish cannery operated by the Klawock Cooperative Association (KCA), an Indian Association organized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934.1 After KCA’s default in the revolving loan fund program, BIA in 1979 assumed control over its assets and arranged for operation of the cannery in 1979 through a lease with an unrelated Washington corporation. The case is before the court on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  3. Russell Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  2. Peninsula Group Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  3. Essen Mall Properties v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Prevado Village Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  5. Prestex, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API