Legal Opinion

State v. Wooten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2010No. COA09-1551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Judge.

Cherron Wooten (Defendant) appeals from judgment entered on his conviction of misdemeanor stalking and argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on the ground of insufficient evidence. Because we conclude that, in the light most favorable to the State, there was substantial evidence presented on each essential element of the offense, we hold the trial court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion to dismiss.

On 17 January 2007, Defendant was charged with misdemeanor stalking for harassing Danny Keel on specific occasions between 1 November 2006 and 16…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. FroggeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MazurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. PlotzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
  5. State v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API