Legal Opinion

State v. Stills

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1984No. 462A83PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

Defendant first claims that certain testimony designated as “corroborative” by the state far exceeded the proper bounds of corroboration and should never have been permitted by the trial court. We agree and remand this case for a new trial.

Toby Crandall and Glenda Cook were the only persons to testify as to matters they claimed to have observed firsthand. In addition, the state called six corroborative witnesses: family members Altha Joyce Crandall and Tammy Jones; Officer Marshall Gravley of the Buncombe County Sheriffs Department; Jane Olmsted of the Forsyth County…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. EfflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. MarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. BlairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. State v. FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API