Legal Opinion
Osborne v. Biotti
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 13, 1989PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The sole issue before us is whether the defendants, Joseph Biotti, Jr., Gilbert P. Leonard, and Paul F. Lorenz, as the trustees of the Masconomo Realty Trust (hereinafter collectively Masconomo), are entitled to postjudgment interest on an award of costs. Masconomo appeals from a Supe nor Court judge’s allowance of a motion to recall a writ of execution previously issued to Masconomo which provided for interest on an award of costs. We transferred the appeal to this court on our own motion, and now reverse.
The plaintiffs, Joan and James Osborne (Osbornes), were unsuccessful in the negligence…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Copper Liquor, Inc., Robert Earl Basham, Jr., of the Estate of Harold Letcher, Deceased, Cross-Appellant v. Adolph Coors Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- City of Charlotte v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Patry v. Liberty Mobilehome Sales, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Creed v. ApogMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Trustees of the Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Waldman v. American Honda Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- O'Malley v. O'MalleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Smith v. Pritchett (In Re Smith)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Ben v. SchultzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- City Coal Co. of Springfield, Inc. v. NoonanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.