Stokes v. Wagoner
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Associate Chief Justice:
¶ 1 Plaintiff Betty Stokes appeals from a trial court’s order dismissing her complaint under Utah R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), on the ground that it is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We reverse.
¶ 2 In 1988, Ms. Stokes engaged the law firm of Van Wagoner & Stevens (the “firm”) to pursue a workers’ compensation claim and an employment discrimination claim on her behalf. The Labor Commission (the “Commission”) dismissed Stokes’ workers’ compensation claim. See Stokes v. Board of Review, 832 P.2d 56, 57 (Utah Ct.App.1992) (“Stokes I ”). Following the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State Tax Commission v. Spanish ForkUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- Stokes v. Board of Review of Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- Stokes v. FlandersUtah Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- William A. Graham Co. v. HaugheyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Clark v. Deloitte & Touche LLPUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Cazares v. CosbyUtah Supreme Court · 2003
- Hunter v. Sunrise Title Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
- Quick Safe-T Hitch, Inc. v. RSB Systems L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.