Legal Opinion

State Tax Commission v. Spanish Fork

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1940No. 6162PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment which held that the statute of limitations against a claim for sales taxes began to run from the date that Spanish Fork, as a collector of sales taxes, was by law required to make a return for, sales taxes due. Appellant contends that the statute of limitat-tions did not begin to run until Spanish Fork, or the Commission for it, actually made the return. This appeal must be resolved by determining whether the view of the lower court or that of the appellant is correct.

Persons liable for the collection of sales taxes are, by Sec. 5, Chap. 20,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Federal Reserve Bank Ex Rel. American Surety Co. v. Atlanta Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  3. Sweetser v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. New York & Penna. Co. v. N. Y. Central R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. C. M. Barnes v. Turner and KirkwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Davidson Lumber Sales, Inc. v. Bonneville Investment, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API