Legal Opinion

Keith v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1970No. 7010SC343Published

1Opinion of the CourtVaughn, J.

The defendant brings forward but one exception and assignment of error. It contends that error was committed in the court’s failure to grant its motion for nonsuit. The defendant contends that the negligence of the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injury and that the defendant was without negligence contributing to the injury. We disagree.

The Federal Employers’ Liability Act, as set forth in U.S.C.A., Vol. 45, § 51, (hereinafter referred to as the Act) provides that every common carrier by railroad while engaged in intrastate or interstate or foreign commerce, shall be liable in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Cobia v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Graham v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Davis v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API