Legal Opinion

Cobia v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 29, 1924PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

It was conceded on tbe trial that the defendant is a common carrier by railroad, engaged in interstate commerce, and that plaintiff’s intestate was employed by the defendant in such commerce at the time of his injury and death. The case, therefore, is one arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, and it has been properly tried under that act. Shanks v. Del. R. Co., 239 U. S., 556; Capps v. R. R., 183 N. C., 181; Renn v. R. R., 170 N. C., 128. The deceased employee left a widow and three small children him surviving, and his administratrix, or personal representative, is prosecuting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Hubbard v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Fike v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Goode v. BartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. McWilliams v. ParhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API