Futrelle v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the writ should not be granted. See his dissent in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons given in Mr. Justice Harlan's opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 559.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
3Cited by20 opinions
- Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gibson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Anthony S. Pehowic v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.