Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1957No. 743PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted limited to that part of the judgment in favor of Southern Railway Company and that part of the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial. In all other respects, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500. Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the writ should not be granted. See his dissent in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524. Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker dissent for the reasons given in Mr. Justice Harlan's opinion in Rogers v.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Panhandle & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gibson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Wehrli v. Wabash Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  4. Ferguson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Moore v. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API