Legal Opinion
Medix Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 2002No. G029042PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
We realize that the demands made on busy
trial judges approach, if they do not already exceed, the unrealistic. This is particularly true in counties such as Orange County where all civil cases are immediately assigned to direct calendar courts. Judges with heavy case loads are expected to preside over trials, hear law and motion, rule on ex parte applications, conduct settlement and status conferences, and perform additional administrative duties. All this under the requirements of the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act (Gov. Code, § 68600 et seq.) and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Valdez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Michaelian v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Wills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bravo v. IsmajCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Ayala v. Frito Lay, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Thompson v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. MorenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.