Legal Opinion
United States v. Blackmon
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided September 10, 1980No. LR-C-77-197PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EISELE, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Judgment, which the Court will treat as a Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons which follow, the motion will be granted.
This case arose out of the construction of two apartment complexes-one in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, sponsored by Piney Woods Apartments, Inc. (Piney Woods), to which Counts I through III apply; and the other in Houston, Texas, to which Counts IV through VII apply. Both projects were financed through mortgages…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. CardinalDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1978
- United States v. Pall CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc. v. Osvaldo CardonaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- United States v. QuinonesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- United States v. WhitesellDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.