Legal Opinion

United States v. Pall Corporation

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 30, 1973No. 73-C-45PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUDD, District Judge.

This action for breach of contract is before the court on the motion of defendant Pall Corporation, before answer, to dismiss the complaint as barred on its face by the statute of limitations.

The Complaint

The complaint was filed on January 9, 1973. It recites that four pumps were purchased in 1965 by Consolidation Coal Company from Integral Motor Pump Corporation, a subsidiary of Pall, for use'in the construction and operation of a coal-to-liquid . fuel pilot plant. The specifications which preceded the purchase order and were made known to Integral…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
  2. Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Foodtown v. Sigma Marketing Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  5. Balog v. Center Art Gallery-Hawaii, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API