Legal Opinion
Smith v. Carbide and Chemicals Corp.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 5, 2004No. 1:97-mj-00003PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
McKINLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion by Defendants for summary judgment [DN 279] and on a motion by Plaintiffs for partial summary judgment [DN 278]. Fully briefed, this matter is ripe for decision. For the reasons set forth below, the motion by the Defendants for summary judgment is granted and the motion by the Plaintiffs for partial summary judgment is denied.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
In order to grant a motion for summary judgment, the Court must find that the pleadings, together with the depositions, interrogatories and affidavits,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Anthony J. Nieman v. Nlo, Inc. And Nl Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adkins v. Chevron Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Osarczuk v. Associated Universities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Wilcox v. Homestake Mining Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2005
- Smith v. Carbide and Chemicals Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007
- Smith v. Carbide and Chemicals Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2007