Legal Opinion

Draper v. Conner & Walters Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1924PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

It is familiar learning that an easement may be acquired by grant, prescription, or dedication. Milliken v. Denny, 141 N. C., 224. Tbe plaintiff asserted bis acquisition of an easement in the alley both by prescription and by dedication and tendered issues addressed to each of these methods. The judge submitted the issues appearing of record and directed a verdict for the defendant, and the appeal presents the question whether there is any evidence to sustain the plaintiff’s contention.

At common law a right to an incorporeal hereditament may be obtained and secured by use and possession when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boyden v. . AchenbachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Kennedy v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Claflin v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Crump v. . MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  5. Board of Supervisors Public Roads v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hemphill v. . Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Rohrer v. CredleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. City of Durham v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Henry v. FarlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API