In re Fink
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge
From a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the examiner, refusing to allow *717claims numbered 10 and 11, which were all the claims of appellant’s-application, appeal is taken to this court.
Claim 10 is regarded as illustrative and reads:
10. A composite metal having relatively high electronic emissivity which; comprises an alloy of a highly refractory metal from the imperial class including molybdenum, tantalum and tungsten with an emissive agent from the imperial class including zirconium, cerium, thorium and uranium, said alloy being relatively…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Application of Edward Burton LegriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In Re Von BramerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- In Re StollCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- In Re CrowellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Application of Swentzel (Carborundum Co., Assignee)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954