Legal Opinion

Urick v. Burge

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1957No. Docket 19, Calendar 46,854PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action in equity to compel defendant to convey to plaintiff “Lot 110 of Assessor’s Plat of Maple Hill Gardens,” Flint, Michigan, in accordance with the provisions of a written lease. The court concluded that the lease did not express the agreement between the parties, and dismissed plaintiff’s bill of complaint.

Plaintiff appeals, contending (1) that the court erred in making a contract for the parties contrary to the clear and definite terms of the lease; (2) that the record does not sustain the court’s finding that plaintiff and defendant were “mutually mistaken with…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldberg v. Cities Service Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson Family Ltd. Partnership v. White Pine Wireless, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Goldman v. Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Langschwager v. PinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Ouellette v. BelangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Urick v. BurgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API